Pay by Bank in 2026: Why Europe's Payment Shift Is Accelerating
The adoption data is unambiguous. Cards are structurally losing ground across Europe. Here is what the numbers mean for your payment strategy - and why the window to act is narrowing.
- Remove the current class from the content27_link item as Webflows native current state will automatically be applied.
- To add interactions which automatically expand and collapse sections in the table of contents select the content27_h-trigger element, add an element trigger and select Mouse click (tap)
- For the 1st click select the custom animation Content 27 table of contents [Expand] and for the 2nd click select the custom animation Content 27 table of contents [Collapse].
- In the Trigger Settings, deselect all checkboxes other than Desktop and above. This disables the interaction on tablet and below to prevent bugs when scrolling.
Pay by Bank grew 53% year-on-year in the UK in 2025. In the Netherlands, over 80% of consumers use it monthly. Across Western Europe, one in three online shoppers say they are willing to use it right now. This is not an emerging trend. It is an accelerating structural shift in how Europe pays - and the window for businesses to act ahead of it is narrowing.
- The market signal: what the adoption data is telling us
- Why cards are structurally losing ground in Europe
- The business economics: what staying on cards is actually costing
- Where the shift is happening fastest by industry
- The regulatory tailwind: PSD3 and the Instant Payments Regulation
- Beyond Pay by Bank: Open Banking as the gateway to stablecoins
The Market Signal: What the Adoption Data Is Telling Us
The conventional wisdom about Pay by Bank was that it would take a decade to go mainstream. The Netherlands proved that wrong in under five years. The UK proved it wrong again. And the rest of Europe is now following the same curve - faster, because the regulatory infrastructure is already in place.
What makes these numbers strategically important is not the absolute size - it is the trajectory. Pay by Bank in the UK grew 70% year-on-year between 2024 and 2025. The Netherlands iDEAL model, which now commands 80% monthly consumer usage, was built over a decade of consistent infrastructure investment and consumer education. The UK is replicating that curve in a fraction of the time, and Germany, France, and the Nordics are beginning to follow.
The signal is not that Pay by Bank is growing. The signal is that it is growing while cards are standing still. Two-thirds of European e-commerce transactions are projected to use alternative payment methods by 2026 - including Pay by Bank, digital wallets, and local schemes. Cards, for the first time, will not hold the majority of online transaction value in major European markets. That is a structural inflection point, not a cyclical fluctuation.
When a payment method grows 53% year-on-year while the incumbent grows at single digits, the question for businesses is not whether to adopt it. The question is how much market share you are willing to cede to competitors who adopt it first.
Why Cards Are Structurally Losing Ground in Europe
Cards were not designed to be slow, expensive, and vulnerable to fraud. They were designed for a world where the alternative was cash, the internet did not exist, and real-time settlement was physically impossible. In that world, they were an extraordinary innovation. In 2026, they are infrastructure built for 1960 competing against infrastructure built for now.
The structural disadvantages of card payments compound with scale. A small business processing €50,000 per month in card transactions may absorb the 2% interchange cost as a necessary expense. A business processing €5 million per month is writing a €100,000 cheque every month to card networks and processors - for a service that settles in two days, carries chargeback liability, and shares no transaction data with the merchant.
The four structural failings driving the shift
Cost is non-negotiable and compounding
Interchange fees, scheme fees, processor markup, and gateway costs stack to 1.5-3.5% per transaction. Unlike most business costs, they scale directly with revenue - meaning the more successful a business becomes, the more it pays card networks. Pay by Bank processing costs are a fraction of this, and they do not scale the same way.
Chargeback liability is rising, not falling
Global chargeback volume is projected to reach 324 million transactions annually by 2028 - a 24% increase from 2025. Friendly fraud, where consumers dispute legitimate transactions, now accounts for the majority of disputes in e-commerce. Card networks place the burden of proof and the cost of disputes entirely on merchants. Pay by Bank transactions are non-reversible by design - the chargeback mechanism does not exist.
Decline rates are a hidden conversion killer
Card decline rates in Europe average 5-15% depending on the sector - and in high-risk verticals like trading, gaming, and crypto-adjacent services, they can exceed 20%. Every declined card payment is a lost customer who authenticated their intent, entered their details, and was turned away by an issuing bank's risk algorithm. Pay by Bank bypasses the issuing bank's decline logic entirely: if the funds exist, the payment succeeds.
Card data is not your data
When a customer pays by card, the transaction data - spend patterns, timing, frequency - belongs to the card network and the issuing bank. The merchant receives a confirmation and a settlement amount. Pay by Bank creates a direct, structured data relationship between payer and payee, with full transaction visibility and audit trail sitting with the merchant, not the network.
The Business Economics: What Staying on Cards Is Actually Costing
The cost of not adopting Pay by Bank is rarely calculated directly - it is treated as the baseline, the status quo, the cost of doing business. That framing is changing. As Pay by Bank infrastructure matures and adoption scales, the cost of staying exclusively on cards has a measurable price that compounds annually.
| Cost dimension | Cards | Pay by Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Processing fees | 1.5–3.5% per transaction | Significantly lower |
| Settlement timing | T+1 to T+2 - capital tied up | Seconds - 24/7/365 |
| Chargeback cost | €20–€100 per dispute + merchandise lost | Near-zero - non-reversible |
| Decline rate cost | 5–15% of potential revenue lost | ~0% - funds exist, payment succeeds |
| Subscription churn | Up to 50% driven by card expiry cycles | Zero - bank accounts do not expire |
| Fraud liability | Merchant carries CNP fraud liability | Bank-verified auth - zero merchant liability |
The compounding effect is significant. A business with €10 million in annual card processing volume, a 1% chargeback rate, and an 8% decline rate is not just paying 2% in processing fees. It is losing approximately €800,000 annually in declined transactions, absorbing €74 per disputed transaction across thousands of chargebacks, and funding a team to manage the operational overhead of dispute resolution. The true cost of cards is not 2%. It is closer to 4-6% when all friction is accounted for.
Where the Shift Is Happening Fastest by Industry
Pay by Bank adoption is not uniform across industries. The shift is accelerating fastest in sectors where the structural failings of card payments are most acute - and where the business model is most sensitive to chargeback rates, decline rates, and settlement timing.
The Regulatory Tailwind: PSD3 and the Instant Payments Regulation
Pay by Bank's commercial adoption is accelerating on its own merits. But the regulatory environment in Europe is now actively accelerating it further - and this is the part of the story that most businesses are underestimating.
The Instant Payments Regulation - January 2025
The EU's Instant Payments Regulation, which came into force in January 2025, requires all EU payment service providers to offer instant credit transfers in euros at no additional cost to consumers. This mandate removes the last meaningful friction point for Pay by Bank at scale: the perception that bank transfers are slow. Under the regulation, bank-to-bank transfers in the EU settle in ten seconds or less, 24 hours a day, at parity pricing with standard transfers. The infrastructure argument for cards - that they are faster and always on - no longer holds.
PSD3 - strengthening open banking at the infrastructure level
PSD3 is expected to deliver the most significant upgrade to Europe's open banking infrastructure since PSD2 was introduced in 2018. The key changes for Pay by Bank are practical: improved API performance standards for banks, clearer liability frameworks for payment initiation service providers, and stronger consumer consent and data portability rights. Together, these changes address the remaining reliability and trust objections that have slowed adoption in markets where PSD2 implementation was inconsistent.
Europe is not just permitting Pay by Bank to grow. It is actively mandating the infrastructure conditions that make it the structurally superior choice for both consumers and businesses. Businesses that treat Pay by Bank as optional are misreading the regulatory direction of travel.
Beyond Pay by Bank: Open Banking as the Gateway to Stablecoins
The market analysis so far covers Pay by Bank as a payment rail replacing cards at checkout. That is the near-term story. The medium-term story is more consequential: Open Banking is not just a cheaper card alternative. It is the infrastructure bridge between the traditional banking system and the stablecoin payment economy - and that connection is already live.
At Yugo, Open Banking A2A serves two distinct functions that can be used independently or together. The first is Pay by Bank as a direct payment rail - instant A2A settlement for pay-ins, with near-zero chargebacks and settlement in seconds. The second is the fiat on-ramp: Open Banking as the cleanest, most cost-efficient mechanism for converting fiat currency into stablecoin, enabling cross-border settlement across 180+ countries without correspondent banking relationships, FX markups, or multi-day delays.
Stablecoins moved over $2 trillion across borders in 2024. The corridors growing fastest are precisely the ones where traditional banking infrastructure is most expensive and least reliable: Europe to Africa, Middle East to Asia, intra-EU cross-currency flows. For businesses with international payment volumes, this is not a future consideration. It is a current competitive advantage available today.
The Window Is Narrowing
The businesses that integrated Pay by Bank in 2023 and 2024 built a cost advantage that is now compounding. Every month of card-only processing is a month of avoidable fees, avoidable chargebacks, and avoidable decline losses. Every quarter without Pay by Bank in markets where it dominates consumer preference is a quarter of conversion rate underperformance relative to competitors who offer it.
The adoption curve in Europe has moved from experimental to mainstream. The regulatory tailwind is accelerating. The consumer preference data is unambiguous. And the extension of Open Banking into stablecoin settlement means that businesses integrating now are not just solving today's payment problem - they are building the infrastructure for cross-border growth at a fraction of the cost of traditional banking rails.
They pay from their bank. You receive in seconds. No card. No chargeback. No reason to wait.
Related Reading on the Yugo Blog
They pay from their bank.
You receive in seconds.
No card. No chargeback. No reason to wait.
One API. Both dimensions of modern payments.
Use cases
Travel
Accelerate travel payments and boost efficiency. Empower your business with instant, secure, and compliant multi-rail settlements worldwide.
Trading
Redefining Payments for CFD & Forex: Fast Transactions, Global Accessibility, and Regulatory Compliance